this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
603 points (98.4% liked)

Fediverse

28525 readers
278 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I'm not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could argue that this is what happened to Jabber.

Although Facebook Messenger never made a good faith attempt to interoperate with Jabber in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was Google's GTalk not Facebook's Messenger.

Facebook never needed Jabber for their messenger.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was both, but Facebook Messenger was less widely known and was kind of janky. here's a source that explains part of what was going on.

https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/44482/can-you-send-messages-to-facebook-users-from-external-xmpp-servers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah I see, so they never federated with XMPP. This would be comparable if they would take Mastodon server and build Threads from it, but never connected it to the Fediverse.

GTalk used Jabber to help bootstrap their I'm then stole part of Jabber's user base.