this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
640 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
7 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 116 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Lol, twitter was brilliant when it was 144 character text messages. Then it got ruined by adding photos. Now it is going the rest of the way down the tubes by becoming becoming video first. Ugh.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh yea back when it needed that limit because the whole point was to text it over SMS and you could post with any SMS capable phone lol

That was fun and unique, now it's just...boring? Just another social media site, it's only defining thing is it's (declining) size and reach

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

SMS was the original reason, but the side effect of forcing people to condense their thoughts into a couple sentences was pretty wonderful. Especially for an open ended community where anyone can talk about anything.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree with you simply because brevity is nice but not at the expense of nuance. Having to try to follow a string of tweets because one simply can't suffice is awful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand the difficulty, the series of tweets are all replies to the previous tweet in the chain. Where's the difficulty?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Likewise I don't understand the difficulty in reading more than 140 characters.

But I've never used Twitter so when I experience the platform it's through screen caps of tweets. Instead of having paragraphs and cohesive formatting it reads like a programmer who writes code all in one line. Sure, it can be done and it can be read but it's fucking awful that it isn't formatted correctly so that it is more clear.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's formatted how you'd expect if you've a timeline on anything, most recent at the top though, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thats not formatting. That's like reading a book transcribed on post-it notes and calling it a format. It can be ordered, yes but I'm talking about paragraphs and complete sentences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Sure, it's split into smaller bits because it's on a site designed for short posts, it's not hard to follow though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Wonderful in theory, but in practice it's a dumpster fire. Quick, mainstreamm-acceptable takes are incentived, and nuanced, alternative viewpoints are nearly impossible.

If it were all for hobby stuff, it would be fine, but when this is how most people get their news, it's not good.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago

Hey at least photos worked....

Video playback doesn't work half the time, and the other half the time it insists on 140p playback and then freezes.

They're doubling down on something they've been failing at for years.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Not to nitpick but I think the limit was 140?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and storage expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Typo. Was supposed to swipe “storage expenses”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

swipe, huh?

Gotta proofread, man :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can confirm. This is the way.

I keep on taking that lesson from time to time, but I still haven’t passed the final exam.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah "let's make it like youtube" what could go wrong.