527
‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
527 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
58303 readers
9 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's a third solution you're overlooking.
3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
It's not really about the AI content being a violation or not though is it. It's more about a corporation using copyrighted content without permission to make their product better.
If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.
AI does not “read books” and it’s completely disingenuous to compare them to humans that way.
That's certainly an opinion you have
Backed by technical facts.
AIs fundamentally process information differently than humans. That’s not up for debate.
Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
I could say the same about you, considering I’ve watched you peddle false information for months about this subject.
AI learns differently than humans. That isn’t a fact up for debate. That’s one of the few objective truths around this industry.
I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.
Ok and?
That doesn’t mean it’s any less theft, or that you have any idea what you’re talking about.
https://www.rws.com/blog/large-language-models-humans/
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rjghymycfrMY2aRk5/llm-cognition-is-probably-not-human-like
There’s also countless papers on google scholar that point out the differences.
My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.
You use an AI to help you come up with your talking points at your job at the IOF?
Similarly I don't read "War and Peace" and then use that to go and write "Peace and War"