this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
372 points (99.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43902 readers
1129 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren't worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I would be careful with gadgets that have software on them like phones and laptops. God knows what kind of Chinese spyware they come with.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I am sure China established NSA in 1960s and started global surveillance programs in 70s. And Snowden and Assange exposed Chinese government.

Oh wait.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When it comes to hardware, isn't the situation usually...

  • American company is spying on customers through hardware it sold
  • American government is actively trying to spy on citizens through hardware (American-made or not), but the company blocks them unless they have a warrant
  • Chinese company freely shares data back and forth through the Chinese government using their hardware thanks to "backdoors"
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the company blocks them unless they have a warrant

Heard of FISA courts and gag orders? Every single company involved in Snowden leaks had one for PRISM, and for every single NSA ops conducted since 1970s. This is an open thing.

You may go read pages 63 and 64 here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.564903/gov.uscourts.nysd.564903.152.0_1.pdf

Chinese company freely shares data back and forth through the Chinese government using their hardware thanks to "backdoors"

I never get evidence from US government for this, despite the bullshit propaganda they invent and disseminate via media. Even Germany and UK's GCHQ declared Huawei 5G gear to be clean, until USA nudged them to quietly align with the "narrative" and protect NATO's xenophobic interests, if they do not want consequences. What are these Chinese hardware backdoors, that I barely see anything on, compared to that on Cisco routers, Intel, AMD, Siemens, Nokia and other US/Europe tech companies?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How else is China collecting all its data on its citizens?

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Very, very basic userspace level software methods. Methods that do not even need to go as deep as Facebook/Google/Apple or others.

Spying on people is easier than you think. Create fear and citizens will comply with just about anything for their "safety". But in China's case, the two Opium Wars lost against the 8 Nation Alliance is far too traumatic, and that serves as the fuel for current and old people to never see their children in the same world. The "Century of Humiliation" is a phrase easy to notice, and they are quite keen on regaining their global financial position they had before Western Industrial Revolution and Britain's "laissez faire" colonialism happened.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is classic whataboutism. You should try to avoid it because it's an incredibly poor defense if nothing else.

I've been bitching about the PATRIOT Act since less than a week after 9/11 happened. The Act's continued existence doesn't excuse China's well-documented bad behavior.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well-documented deeznuts. China's bad behaviour mostly has only one source, that anonymous CIA or Pentagon guy who does not wish to be named, and it almost always turns out to be either false or a dishonest interpretation.

Whataboutism is a dog whistle word used by Westerners for deflection used to abrupt or end the argument when there are no real counterpoints. And since US government loves to demonize their "near-peer competitors" (official term) China and Russia, its perfectly fair to argue with US in perspective.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you spent any time reading the articles, you would see Australian sources for incidents dating back to 2012, Lithuanians reporting in 2018, and various private security companies also weighing in.

If the only defence you have for bad behavior is that other people do it, then I guess slavery, mass murder, torture, and theft are all okay. I don't accept when people do those things, and not because I haven't done them but because I believe they are damaging to society no matter who does them. That applies to various acts on the national level, as well.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Too bad I know the kind of anti-China drivel Australia (deputy sheriff of NATO) pushes out with 60 Minutes and via their Murdoch media network, and surely enough you are not convincing me with Lithuania, the country that thinks Taiwan is a country, and the same country whose military lied about Xiaomi spying a couple years ago on behest of US government.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I made a mistake, not in anything I said but in assuming you were willing and able to discuss this in good faith.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My mistake was giving you the benefit of doubt that you might not have a pro-NATO pro-capitalist xenophobic agenda.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Actually, that's super exciting! I would have a fun time taking it apart, analyzing it, and publishing it. Would be great publicity, and would probably make me more money than the laptop/phone/whatever cost me.

That being said, the USA has the most established history of compromising cryptography and security. It's not so much that I trust China or don't trust the USA, it's that I don't trust any superpower, am fairly wary of nations in general, and in fact don't have much trust for organizations of anything over a handful of people.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And the rest of the world will say the same with respect to American spyware.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a foreign nation, why would you use a core piece of software on all your government computers? I'll never understand why Windows is used in any secure government installation, let alone non-American ones.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Because Microsoft forces itself on countries with deals. Its how they have always done things. Contractual lock in until folks are stuck needing windows for proprietary software.

Microsoft actively goes to schools and governments using linux or mac and makes cheap contracts, at first, to move them all and they bribe too.

Monopoly is their goal always

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

If you are seriously worried about privacy you could always use open source stuff. Some hardware from China has compatibility with open source firmware cause they're built out of those projects. The software risk from that stuff is about as high as shit from anywhere else.