this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
-29 points (40.5% liked)

Fediverse

27910 readers
6 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Title says it. Apparently lemmy devs are not concerned with such worldly matters as privacy, or respecting international privacy laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's been a problem for a while. Considering major social media companies have already gotten massive fines from the EU for violating the GDPR, maybe the lemmy devs will put more effort in setting up a deletion system once the EU sends them a fine for breaking the law?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They can't fine the "lemmy devs" (nor any other Fediverse devs). They can fine the operators of servers, and even there only those operating servers in the legal jurisdiction of the EU (which is checks notes the EU).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In this case, the "lemmy devs" and the operators of lemmy.ml are the same people and it's hosted within EU.
But - that's still a far cry from getting any kind of GDPR violation report going, much less getting it through the process to actual fines.
People like to bring up GDPR violations as a some kind of super-moderator tool, but it isn't that easy and it definitely isn't automated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You are missing ~~the~~several points.

  1. Lemmy is software. lemmy.ml is a server. The devs of Lemmy can't be fined unless specifically the server they operate (lemmy.ml, recall) is doing something against the GDPR.
  2. There is more than Lemmy in this picture. You're on kbin. There's dozens of other servers based on ActivityPub out there, all of which can be breaking the GDPR. This non-problem is not related to Lemmy. It's the foundational architecture of ActivityPub. (And HTTP, incidentally. And XMPP. And and and and... Literally every distributed protocol ever made or that ever will be made has this non-problem.
  3. The things people are complaining about here may not actually even be covered by GDPR.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, sorry, man. All the ignorance was blurring together and your post was caught unjustly in the fringe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The EU doesn't have global jurisdiction, if an instance developer or admin has no EU presence then they could just ignore them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure, but EU data protection laws may require EU based Lemmy instances to block instances that dont honour deletion requests.

This is why mastodon was built GDPR compliant by design.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure. Lemmy does have such a presence though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

"Lemmy" is a piece of software. A piece of software can't violate the GDPR, it's just a blob of data. You need to be running a server to do something that would break the GDPR. Those server-running admins are the ones that need to be concerned about their EU presence.

Maybe some of the people developing Lemmy are in that category and might get in trouble, but it will be because they're running servers not because they're developing Lemmy. If they get arrested or whatever it has no effect on Lemmy-the-software.