this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
-29 points (40.5% liked)

Fediverse

27910 readers
9 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Title says it. Apparently lemmy devs are not concerned with such worldly matters as privacy, or respecting international privacy laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

seems weird this expectation of privacy on public sites built for public consumption of public content posted by people publicly.

i mean, i get wanting to control your data. the software i use allows for this ( the 'bins offer a user-level purge).

but privacy? seems weird

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, to have a Lemmy account you already decided to put your trust in total strangers with questionable security credentials.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Mastadon works the same way, all ActivityPub services work the same way.

By being Federated that means data is being sent to remote servers. Sometimes that data doesn't always make it, like a delete request. So someone on their own home-server deletes their post, but on some remote server where that post they made is cached, it's not deleted, because the delete request never federated. For example, say you made a post on your own box, which you clearly have, and you delete a post, but it doesn't get deleted over on say, Lemmy.world. That's not purposeful, that's something the developers also trying to fix, so I think it's disingenuous to say they don't care.

This is literally a consequence of how federation works. It's not a purposeful violation of GDPR.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

sorry, i was just being snotty.

i know full well and am on the side of pointing out the futility of attempting privacy in a public space.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

You may not be directly using it, but this is part and parcel of the entire point of federated social media. Other software will be accessing the pool.