this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
664 points (98.4% liked)

Games

31990 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just a quick question, why? Is it because Take2 or Rockstar will come after anyone that they think copied their code, or are there a lot of bad practices used in GTA5's code?

[–] [email protected] 131 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Because even the possibility that you implemented somebody else’s proprietary code from memory or inspiration opens up a lot of legal issues.

And while you may win there’s no winners when you or your employer has to pay your side of legal fees. It’s best to just avoid it to make that process easier.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If they can prove it. There's only so many way to do something in code

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They don’t have to prove anything to take you to court

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yes they do. And they'd need to look at your source code to prove you copied theirs. It'd be basically impossible to prove unless you were stupid enough to have the GTA V source code on your work machine.

Peep the code on a website, and they'll have no evidence and the case will get dismissed for being frivolous. Do you think Rockstar is omniscient? People look at the source code, then leave the company for a competitor every week.

Code can't even be patented, so unless you copy some propriety process for computing physics or something, that they have a patent on, then they really have no legal standing.

This meme of "don't look at it" is very ignorant to the reality of professional software development. Our memories aren't wiped when we switch jobs and they'd have to prove you didn't pick that idea up from another job, a forum, a colleague, or even a dream.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Do you think Rockstar is omniscient?

Seriously. There is actually zero way Rockstar would ever know even if you outright stole some of the code unless you were to admit it. And definitely not if you got some inspiration from it.

The derivative code will get compiled. What are they going to do, pick apart the machine code from every game released from now on to see if it somehow matches a chunk from GTA? And then somehow track down and prove that one of the probably dozens of employees who worked on the game looked at this leaked source code? Good luck with that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah there's no chance anyone would even know unless you straight up copied enough code that the same bugs and weird physics behaviors show up in your game.

You can get in trouble for having it on your hard drive because it's copyright infringement, but not for looking at it on a website.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not sure about Rockstar, but this seems like something Nintendo would do lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Nintendo would replicate that FTC Family Guy episode if they could.

[–] sukhmel 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Our memories aren't wiped when we switch jobs

Now that's the real problem here /s

Also, this already been a trope in a movie

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Companies do get sued for that as well

[–] sukhmel 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

~~For wiping memory of ex-workers? Or for illegal non competitive contract items? You lost me somewhat~~

Ah, nevermind, I got your point. Yes it happens and it doesn't always happen fairly

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The proof is they have more money and lawyers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If this includes the euphoria physics engine and someone copies it… it will be incredibly easy to prove that it’s stolen.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure if you copy the whole thing. But if you treat it like another resource like Stack Overflow then the only way to get caught is if you put the code on your work machine.

People quit their job and move to a company every week and the knowledge of rockstars engine doesn't leave their brain.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Didn't you hear about TakeTwo's TakeTwo brain implants? They take two chips and put them in emloyees heads. It acts as their work-related memory. When they come into the office it activates and when they go home it turns off (supposedly). There's no way you could fool such sofisticated TakeHome tech!

/s obv

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They should make a show about that!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Depends on which country you're in. I would bet if you do it in Russia there will be zero consequences.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 10 months ago

The consequence of living in Russia is you will die in occupied Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

when you or your employer has to pay your side of legal fees

Where I live, the losing side must pay for all legal fees

[–] sukhmel 14 points 10 months ago

That is if you will have enough to keep going until you win. Having to pay a hundred grands for years may be a price to just prove you're innocent, after that you'll be refunded (sometime)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Ok, that's what I thought you meant by the original comment but I wanted to make sure.

Thanks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also to add to this, you are disqualified from contributing code to the WINE project if you've seen parts of the Windows source code for this exact same reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

oh interesting. kinda impossible to ensure all the contributors have never seen it though.