this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
11 points (82.4% liked)

D&D Next - 5e Discussion

2394 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.

Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext

-- Rules --

  1. Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
  2. Use Clear, Concise Titles.
  3. Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.

This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
11
"I think Wizards balances classes using damage on a single target nova over 3 rounds." Very interesting post I think is worth sharing (www.reddit.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hate to share from the site we definitely don't think about anymore, but I think this is too interesting to miss. If true, it's a big insight into the design of the game. All credit to that OP of course.

Summary is that WotC's balancing decisions seem to make sense if they balance the classes like they balance monsters, using max damage output over a three-round fight. Basically they overvalue that, especially for certain nova classes (the OP suggests those classes are Fighter/Wizard/Sorcerer) and undervalue utility.

TLDR. WoTC seems to value Single Target Guaranteed DPR in a Nova over 3 rounds, and balances the game around that not too dissimilar to how they calculate the power of CR. And that seems to reflect every design decision and choice they have made when viewed this way, and what they gauge class power around. The core resource management of the game is about novaing now or later, and how can classes recover their novas.

Based on the way they've reigned in nova damage with 1D&D but have left utility spells basically untouched, I think the theory has merit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For sure. Utility, out of combat and exploration aren't numerical determined or balanced. It's all combat comparisons

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which is an insane way to balance the game, right? And I could understand in 2014, but it seems like they're sticking with it in 2023. They nerfed stuff like GWM/SS but I don't think any utility spells really got touched.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's a fine way to balance combat. Utility outside of combat should be, I think, considered entirely separately. Even if you can be the most useful, active character in the party in an RP scenario, being ineffective in combat just straight-up sucks. So I don't think out-of-combat utility is something that should be considered when balancing classes.

That's not to say that I think the out-of-combat utility balance should be ignored, just that it should be considered distinct.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well, I don't entirely disagree, but if you're making classes equal in combat (roughly), you'll need to make them equal out of combat as well (roughly), or else the classes with the best out of combat utility will just be the best overall too, right? And that's pretty difficult, and really not something they seem to be trying to do.

I do agree all classes should be able to contribute to all the general pillars of the game at least somewhat, but also some specialization is inevitable and necessary or else classes would feel too samey. There is always going to end up being one class that's the best at social encounters or exploration, so they need to trade off in other areas for it to be fair.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine since the utility spells were pretty good especially if damage is tuned down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm making the case that the utility powers of casters are too good. Tuning down the damage of martials puts the classes on even footing damage-wise, but when they have even damage but casters have much better utility features to fall back on, they're not equal.