this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
348 points (94.4% liked)

News

23014 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Communities across the U.S. are fueling a secondary arms market by giving seized and surrendered guns to disposal services that destroy one part and resell the rest.

When Flint, Mich., announced in September that 68 assault weapons collected in a gun buyback would be incinerated, the city cited its policy of never reselling firearms.

“Gun violence continues to cause enormous grief and trauma,” said Mayor Sheldon Neeley. “I will not allow our city government to profit from our community’s pain by reselling weapons that can be turned against Flint residents.”

But Flint’s guns were not going to be melted down. Instead, they made their way to a private company that has collected millions of dollars taking firearms from police agencies, destroying a single piece of each weapon stamped with the serial number and selling the rest as nearly complete gun kits. Buyers online can easily replace what’s missing and reconstitute the weapon.

Hundreds of towns and cities have turned to a growing industry that offers to destroy guns used in crimes, surrendered in buybacks or replaced by police force upgrades. But these communities are in fact fueling a secondary arms market, where weapons slated for destruction are recycled into civilian hands, often with no background check required, according to interviews and a review of gun disposal contracts, patent records and online listings for firearms parts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those guns have more constitutional rights than the school children that are indiscriminately murdered with them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

rights are a fiction. all that matters is power. you're not going to fix your problems relying on the rhetoric that surrounds a fiction. you need to seize power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't know Carl Schmitt had a Lemmy Account!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, the sovereignty of ones rights is one of the most important tenants of anarchism.

The idea that they are a fiction and that power is what matters is the bedrock of 20th century authoritarianism from Nazism to MLism to Maoism and so on.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

rights are what thos in power say you may do. if we destroy the structures of power, the language of "rights" is vestigial.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah no, rights are what a society protects from infringement by individual authority figures regardless of official codification or not.

Destroying the structures of unjust and unneeded hierarchy doesn't render rights vestigial it just makes it a lot easier to guarantee them against abuse by authority figures.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

have you ever seen a right? are these rights in the room with us, now? when people in power take your right to privacy through the patriot act, does your right to privacy still exist?

the answer to all of these is "no".

you can keep telling stories about rights, but they are no more real than Santa clause.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am the authority on my own politics. you can't tell me I'm not an anarchist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah but you're not an authority on everyone else's, which is what you're trying to be when you insist that anarchism is compatible with the notion that rights are a fiction.

Literally no other anarchist will agree with that just on the principle of words having meanings that are generally consistent from user to user.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

you insist that anarchism is compatible with the notion that rights are a fiction.

it is

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally no other anarchist will agree with that

wrong

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First, learn to comment once spambot.

And second, either you're a moron or you believe anarchy is just no rules which means yeah you're still a moron it's just that you're also a utopian which is a special kind of moron.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

calling me names doesn't change whether I'm right and you can't tell me what to do.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but you're not an authority on everyone else's, which is what you're trying to be

no, I'm not.