this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

OpenBSD

541 readers
1 users here now

General OpenBSD community!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is an OS which has everything. It's clean, it's simple, it has a helpful community, stable code, and even pretty good package counts to support nearly any desktop/workstation activity.

And yet, I feel like there are nagging issues which ultimately affect all non-mainstream^1^ OSes. Display driver complications, janky system upgrades, a lack of groupware clients. I'm not picking on OpenBSD, I love the distro and I think it should succeed in this particular area (the desktop/workstation) where other open source alternatives have failed, but why hasn't anybody managed to make it happen yet?

For a while, there was a similar hope around DragonflyBSD in the FreeBSD community, but I don't know where that ended up... I do know I see nobody really using it.

What's it going to take?

^1^Obviously, I mean MacOS and Windows, since Linux is at least as hampered on the desktop, perhaps moreso on account of the poor community and scattered vision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A long time ago I really enjoyed the pf firewall in openbsd - it was so much easier than iptables and chains, which I somehow still don't fully understand. How is the obsd experience to do NAT and manage a firewall ruleset these days?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've been digging through the most specific edge cases of pf recently, and while I don't know how it was 10 years ago, I'd say that nowadays it's fantastic.

The syntax is simple, clean, and very powerful. And with anchors you can easily add/remove rules on the fly with a single command.