Advent Of Code

981 readers

29 users here now

An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev!

Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.

AoC 2024

Solution Threads

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25

Rules/Guidelines

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep all content related to advent of code in some way
If what youre posting relates to a day, put in brackets the year and then day number in front of the post title (e.g. [2024 Day 10])
When an event is running, keep solutions in the solution megathread to avoid the community getting spammed with posts

Relevant Communities

Relevant Links

Advent of Code Homepage

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

console.log('Hello World')

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

[email protected]

CameronDev

🎄 - 2023 DAY 1 SOLUTIONS -🎄 (self.advent_of_code)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Ategon to c/advent_of_code

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Welcome everyone to the 2023 advent of code! Thank you all for stopping by and participating in it in programming.dev whether youre new to the event or doing it again.

This is an unofficial community for the event as no official spot exists on lemmy but ill be running it as best I can with Sigmatics modding as well. Ill be running a solution megathread every day where you can share solutions with other participants to compare your answers and to see the things other people come up with

Day 1: Trebuchet?!

Megathread guidelines

Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
Code block support is not fully rolled out yet but likely will be in the middle of the event. Try to share solutions as both code blocks and using something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ or pastebin (code blocks to future proof it for when 0.19 comes out and since code blocks currently function in some apps and some instances as well if they are running a 0.19 beta)

FAQ

What is this?: Here is a post with a large amount of details: https://programming.dev/post/6637268
Where do I participate?: https://adventofcode.com/
Is there a leaderboard for the community?: We have a programming.dev leaderboard with the info on how to join in this post: https://programming.dev/post/6631465

🔒This post will be unlocked when there is a decent amount of submissions on the leaderboard to avoid cheating for top spots

🔓 Edit: Post has been unlocked after 6 minutes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I found a decently short solution for part 2 in python:

DIGITS = {
    'one': '1',
    'two': '2',
    'three': '3',
    'four': '4',
    'five': '5',
    'six': '6',
    'seven': '7',
    'eight': '8',
    'nine': '9',
}


def find_digit(word: str) -> str:
    for digit, value in DIGITS.items():
        if word.startswith(digit):
            return value
        if word.startswith(value):
            return value
    return ''


total = 0
for line in puzzle.split('\n'):
    digits = [
        digit for i in range(len(line))
        if (digit := find_digit(line[i:]))
    ]
    total += int(digits[0] + digits[-1])


print(total)

[–] fhoekstra 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks very elegant! I'm having trouble understanding how this finds digit "words" from the end of the line though, as they should be spelled backwards IIRC? I.e. eno, owt, eerht

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It simply finds all possible digits and then locates the last one through the reverse indexing. It’s not efficient because there’s no shortcircuiting, but there’s no need to search the strings backwards, which is nice. Python’s startswith method is also hiding a lot of that other implementations have done explicitly.