Technology

58303 readers

9 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

324

Firefox is giving Android users a sneak peek at its open extensions (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by AnActOfCreation to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

• Firefox for Android is reintroducing an open ecosystem of extensions, set to be available on December 14, with a dedicated extension page for easy discovery. • Mozilla has released a preview of the upcoming extensions, including popular ones like Bitwarden's password manager and AdGuard's ad blocker. • Firefox aims to gain an advantage over rivals like Google Chrome by supporting a wide range of third-party extensions on Android, while Firefox extensions availability on iOS remains uncertain.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla is bringing back extensions for Firefox on Android, which were removed in 2020 for security reasons and interface overhaul.
Firefox extensions will officially be available on Android on December 14, with a dedicated extension page now available in preview to help users discover new content.
Firefox will be the only major Android browser supporting an open extension ecosystem, allowing users to create and explore new extensions for the browser.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

security reasons

This is a bit of a weird justification given that they haven't made any significant changes to extensions on desktop. Why should mobile be different?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They refactored the app in 2020 and they decided that they didn’t want to build robust support for the extension architecture that they were going to migrate away from. And the new architecture was going to be more open and more secure.

It wasn’t that they were intentionally disabling a feature because of a security vulnerability. It was that they didn’t want to rebuild the old busted thing when a better solution was on the roadmap.

Although, the planning around this was shit. A three year gap wasn’t great.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure that passes a sanity check. Third-party builds and nightly (after jumping through some arbitrary hoops) have been able to install extensions from AMO that aren't officially supported on mobile since fairly shortly after the refactor. While it was possible for extensions to have performance, battery consumption, and compatibility problems specific to Android, that was also true prior to the refactor.

Maybe there's something I'm missing - I'd welcome a link to something rich in technical details.