this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
143 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I mean... They invented reusable rockets.

Edit: they invented the first reusable liquid-fueled rockets and the first rockets that can autonomously land themselves. NASA used reusable solid rocket boosters on the space shuttle that would deploy parachutes and land in the ocean. Getting a solid rocket booster back into a reusable state seems like a lot of work to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They absolutely didn't invent reusable rockets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They created reusable rockets. Lots and lots of concepts on the drawing board, but theirs was unique and the first one to get made.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The rocket boosters on the space shuttle were absolutely reused. Here's video of one being retrieved.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

We can argue about semantics, but they were moreso rebuilt from the same parts than reused as is. NASA found that it would have been much cheaper to build new SRBs after each launch than rebuild them.

[–] Strykker 3 points 1 year ago

SRB boosters are quite close to literally just a big steel tube, and they reused them by dropping them into the ocean under a parachute.

They still had to clean out and refurb every booster launched. And that was without the complex rocket engines that would get destroyed by being submerged in the ocean.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Creating isn't inventing, and there's wasn't the first to be flown. Man, the SpaceX fans don't really know the history of the industry they make these claims about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (24 children)

You referring to the DC-X subscale tech demonstrator?

I think inventing is a less well defined term, since anyone with a napkin can claim to invent something to a very low fidelity. The details are the hard part, not the idea itself. So that's why I specified created, since that is inventing to a very high level of fidelity.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've had experience with Musk Fans in the past. They all read from the same script, including the "I don't even like Musk" lie.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Who outside of TinTin comics has done a reusable rockets other than SpaceX?

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)