Technology

58303 readers

11 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

424

Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music (www.theverge.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google is embedding inaudible watermarks right into its AI generated music::Audio created using Google DeepMind’s AI Lyria model will be watermarked with SynthID to let people identify its AI-generated origins after the fact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

it does this by converting the audio into a 2d visualisation that shows how the spectrum of frequencies evolves in a sound over time

Old school windows media player has entered the chat

Seriously fuck off with this jargon, it doesn’t explain anything

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's actually an accurate description of what is happening: an audio file turned into a 2d image with the x axis being time, the y axis being frequency and color being amplitude.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's literally a spectrograph

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Spectrogram*

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Your mom's literally a spectrograph.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I know, it’s like the old windows media player visualisations.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a bad journalist hasn't understood the explanation. A spectrogram contains all the same data as was originally encoded. I guess all it means is that the watermark is applied in the frequency domain.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Also this isn't new by any stretch... Aphex Twin would like a word

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, encoding stuff in the spectrogram isn't new, sure. But encoding stuff into an audio file that is inaudible but robust to incidental modifications to the file is much harder. Aphex Twin's stuff is audible!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I would like to know what it is that makes it so robust. The article explains very little. Is it in the high frequencies? Higher than the human ear can hear? Compression will effect that plus that’s going to piss dogs off. Could be something with the phasing too. Filters and effects might be able to get rid of the water mark

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I don't know what frequencies are annoying for dogs but I'm guessing it's above 24kHz so no sound file or sound system is going to be able to store or produce it anyway.

There will certainly be some way to get rid of the watermark. But it might nevertheless persist through common filters.