Asklemmy

43946 readers

570 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Would you consider the anonymous sale of nudes cheating? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Having removed metadata and with nothing recognizable in the pic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oooo I think the analogy is a Little off. Just because of the way I interpreted why they said that in the first place.

I think it was said because they are expressing that the nudes are as impersonal as possible, not to say look I deidentified myself. In my case (if I'm right, maybe I'm not) it's a good faith argument to say see, I'm not trying to connect with someone I'm trying to have a business transaction, so comparing it to what wearing a disguise accomplishes in cheating isnt accurate.

Again, that's only based on my interpretation of why op added that bit