this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43946 readers
466 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did anyone attempt to install autocad on lutris, if so what was your experience?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I haven't tried Autocad specifically, but complex non-game software tends to be a struggle. MS Office doesn't even run. Autodesk software wouldn't be the easiest to get running, and probably still have bugs if it does.

For Lutris, I would start by checking if theres even a script for it on there. Lutris basically just has a bunch of scripts to set a Wine prefix up with ideal settings for that software (and generally, just games). For compatibility, best check the databases like WineHQ and ProtonDB.

Couldn't find much on ProtonDB about it. Accourding to WineHQ it varies a lot between versions: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=86

Based on that you could try, but I wouldn't rely production on it. Even if it works well, it would easily break too. These kinda software is finicky and without stable positive results I would be careful.

If you need stability and not a hobby project, you could try FreeCAD if you want native Linux support, or run AutoCAD in a VM. VMware has functionality to make it look near-native while running on a Windows VM in the background. On the otherside, VirtualBox is free but can't do that as smooth.