this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
758 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
10 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is why we can't have nice things.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

It's management's own damn fault for trying to use butt time in seats as a proxy for productivity.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Huh? If the job can be done this fast and the contract says, you get this money for doing that, why should that be wrong, meaning why should anyone be unhappy?

Except companies are just in for the money and would rather pay you less ... Hmmm

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All I can say is I agree with you; however, lots of contracts have you agree that you only work for that company while you're employed by them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think mine has a clause too, that requires me to at least inform my employee

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the point of the clause; to fire people who tell them they're working a second full-time job. When required to be in office everywhere it becomes quite obvious very quickly. They're upset they can't tell if you're two-timing or not if you work from home, so they want to make sure you come in and work for them

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Petty tactics from petty people. If someone is doing the job they are paid for, why bother? It's like the employers are entitled to the 40 hours or something, even if all the work is done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

If someone is doing the job they are paid for,

They aren't if they aren't available because they are working the second job. I question how many people saying this are actually salaried workers who've read their employment agreements.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and the contract says, you get this money for doing that

Almost certainly the contract doesn't say this tho.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mine does. But I'm not working manual labor, so it definitely can and will differ I guess

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that a job you could get away with working 2 at the same time remotely?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, maybe this one and a half time job or sth, I work 4-8 hours a day depending on what's happening (I work in it)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if you're working on something for the second job, do you have to drop it if something comes up with the first one? Does the second job know you're going to be doing that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did I say, that I have a second job? I don't, so that's that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No idea why you're getting down votes.