this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
48 points (70.0% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
376 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We don't. This isn't the U.S. with their freedom of speech, where you can say literally anything. We have something called freedom of expression, which does not cover hate speech, and a few other things.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article is not about free speech absolutism. It is about journalism. Hate speech has nothing to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perhaps the headline should have reflected the actual topic more accurately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe people should've read the article instead of commenting based on the title

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A) Welcome to the internet.

B) I don't actually think it's unreasonable to think that a headline should clearly indicate the subject of the article - why have headlines otherwise?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

A) Take the L and don't do it again.

B) Welcome to the internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Take it up with Nora.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well you should use your freedom of expression to express your concern for israel's actions on mainstream tv channels

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"You" being who?

Edit: it was a genuine follow-up question to a statement that I feel could have been interpreted in a couple of ways, and his answer did give some precisions on his position, which is why I wanted to ask, rather than assume. No idea why refusing to judge hastily warrants downvotes lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the article opens with stories of people losing their positions over comments on gaza conflict

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom of expression doesn't mean free from consequences.

It only means you can't be arrested for what you say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

so in your opinion when charlie hebdo shooting has happened the artists and writers have maintained their freedom of expression well into their deaths? after all they were free to make any kind of comic and they didnt receive any government backlash.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, actually. They did. Consequences don't always come from those in the right. Sometimes they come from fanatics and deviants. Consequences and justice are not synonyms.

You can provide protections from certain unsavory consequences, but those protections will never be perfect. Sometimes terrible things happen to people for expressing themselves. That doesn't mean they didn't have the inalienable right to express themselves in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well thank god they werent fined i guess

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You seem to be conflating two different issues. You may want to consider just how much mixing of philosophies you've been doing. It's probably led to a lot of frustration and anger in your life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US doesn't have freedom of speech either... Source: American.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, you do have it codified in your Constitution as its very first amendment. Now, how much is it really protected, in practice...