this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
636 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

34832 readers
18 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If lemmy had user-defined filters, I'd use them. Right now I'm downvoting the stuff, but there's already a community for musk-related stuff: [email protected]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Moderator here.

Since there is a loud and collective voice, I will do it, but not all news related to Twitter or Musk can be banned. This is something that you folks need to give me input on. There is going to be a level or kind of essential news that impacts us all, that needs to be allowed to post, and for that we need some agreeable middle ground.

Inputs?

[–] onlinepersona 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think anything "musk did/said ABC" should be banned. Reading news about SpaceX or whatever else Musk owns that's technology related is fine IMO, but the constant "Musk this" and "Musk that" just makes me downvote or at "worst" unsub.

Regarding Twitter, if lemmy had filters, I'd block all of that too. However I can see that it has some influence on people and would be fine treating it as an exception to the muskysphere as long as it doesn't contain "Musk" in the title.

My 2 cents. Thank you for considering the ban πŸ™

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as people report, and if I notice that kind of Elon Musk paparazzi gospel crap, it will be removed as long as I stay mod. Active during Indian timezone. I do try complain about Lemmy's mod tools occasionally, because that and some form of CSAM filtering are key concerns now that platform is steadily growing.

incoming rant

Usually an active and reasonable mod tries finding the "moderate" balance on posting and discourse, but they are rare nowadays. I am not spez or a typical reddit mod "mod". I was born out of the community if that makes any sense, so I am handling the privacy and tech sublemmys for a good while, cushioning the impact of Lemmy adopters.

[–] onlinepersona 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank you for your service 🫑

Would you mind adding the "no musk spam" rule?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will do when I wake up. Gonna catch some zzzs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

when you do, another thanks for the mod job & also handling this: your outlook & response is the reason this is already better than That Other Place πŸ‘βœŒοΈ

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Multiple rules have been added.

[–] onlinepersona 1 points 1 year ago

Well-worded! Thank you πŸ™

[–] echutaa 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me it’s the difference between a statements and events. If Musk just says something it’s generally worthless drivel, but if Tesla engineers a new battery pack or gets targeted by a lawsuit then it’s something worth knowing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I had a similar approach in mind, so it seems it will work. I myself despise the Elon Musk yapping and paparazzi gospel tabloid pieces.