Technology

58303 readers

16 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

280

Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection::Irish eyes may not be smiling

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Louis Rossmann can go to fuck himself and his source available app that he keeps calling open source.

Newpipe existed long before Grayjay and will probably be there when grayjay dies since Newpipe's license allows community forks. If the Newpipe team ceases development, others will take their place. If Rossmann ceases development, his app is left for dead

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

If only newpipe didn't suck so hard though.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Users telling developers to fuck themselves is a irony lost in these threads. How many open source projects do you maintain?

[+] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope this license is temporary because this license is non-free.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Subject to the terms of this license, we grant you a non-transferable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.

note how this explicitly leaves out modification.

You may provide the code to anyone else and publish excerpts of it for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution, provided that when you do so you make any recipient of the code aware of the terms of this license, they must agree to be bound by the terms of this license and you must attribute the code to the provider

once again, they exclude modification of the code.

no forks can be made because they aren't allowed to modify the app in anyway.

Additionally, the termination clauses say that they can just terminate your rights to use the code if they feel like it, no other reason needed. This is a direct attack against open source.