this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

weirdway

1 readers
1 users here now

weird (adj.)

c. 1400,

• "having power to control fate", from wierd (n.), from Old English wyrd "fate, chance, fortune; destiny; the Fates," literally "that which comes,"

• from Proto-Germanic wurthiz (cognates: Old Saxon wurd, Old High German wurt "fate," Old Norse urðr "fate, one of the three Norns"),

• from PIE wert- "to turn, to wind," (cognates: German werden, Old English weorðan "to become"),

• from root wer- (3) "to turn, bend" (see versus).

• For sense development from "turning" to "becoming," compare phrase turn into "become."

OVERVIEW

This is a community dedicated to discussing subjective idealism and its implications. For a more detailed explanation, please take a look at our vision statement.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Talk more casually about SI here without having to make a formal post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here’s an example of what I was talking about before /u/mindseal. I was talking about how probability alteration magic spells that don't involve more work/involvement seemed problematic to me somehow. I think I’ve got an example to explain what I mean. Take the idea of scarcity v. abundance. Lots of new age spirituality people talk about the need to create an ‘abundance’ mindset to replace your ‘scarcity’ mindset to get more of what you and everyone else wants out of the world. To bring more abundance to yourself and to others. This is a form of increasing the likelihood of finding/getting wealth.

So let’s talk about how this might work. Maybe it’s about something mundane like building confidence in oneself, but let’s dismiss that option for now because it is unrelated. Why do we have a scarcity mentality? Easy. Because we believe that this is a world with scarce resources and scarce space. There is a limited amount and the resources can be drained. So, assuming we maintain belief in the world ("the world" being a more long-term generally stable environment), how could you make the world abundant? Again, easy. Eliminate scarce resources by manifesting magically that the natural world is effectively infinite and has infinite varieties of infinite resources (including things we conventionally think of as requiring human labor right now) just hanging out right on the surface of the planet. You can go and just pluck a laptop and a mexican food lunch up off a plant in the park. That’s a real world of abundance with no scarcity. One other alternative would be to imagine that the natural world has abundant raw materials but that work may still need to be done – but you could create material abundance for all if you magically manifest a world where there are machines that do all the work and produce infinite finished goods for all of us as much as we want.

There are also two other ways you might change the world to make it abundant just for yourself without making it abundant for others: you could magically manifest the world the same as it is, but where every person obsessively loves you and wants to serve you so that the labor is always done by others to serve you without any effort or conflict. The other way is to keep the world as it is and magically manifest yourself as that one lucky person who just ‘happens’ to almost always have really great things happen to them.

So, mostly I’m saying that probability magic isn’t just a snap your fingers and change your experience thing without addressing some deeper beliefs about how you are manifesting your experience, or living with cognitive dissonance.

Mostly probability magic about the world will create major conflicts with the way we ordinarily think of the world. Only the luck option seems small and relatively easy without reprogramming our whole idea of how the world works, and even that necessitates eliminating the ‘randomization’ aspect of luck which may have other deeper beliefs that structure it that would become de-structured and in need of examination. I guess what I’m saying is that a lot of this stuff has deeper implications than it appears on the surface and is magic that would likely take as much or probably more work than something like healing the body from disease.

What do you think?

Originally commented by u/AesirAnatman on 2017-09-03 05:39:21 (dmh9n2g)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, mostly. I think you do make things a bit more rigid than I. It's true in my own experience that if I want a significant adjustment I have to re-evaluate prior long-standing beliefs and habits, and sometimes I may not even be immediately completely aware of what they are, so it's not easy. But for mild adjustments it's not as hard as all that, and it's not just luck. For example, I've trained my vision before. The biggest conflict there is with the belief that my vision is produced by a physical structure of the eyeball and that structure is how it is and that's that. That's the biggest stumbling block there. But since I was able to at least temporarily improve my vision to a noticeable to me personally degree, it means even without completely overcoming physicalism I was not completely helpless.

So in other words, instead of waiting to have a perfect condition for this or that transformation, it's a good idea to attempt the transformation and perhaps fail, and then work on both transforming things and better understanding them in parallel. So for example, don't try to make it sequential like this: 1st, I'll realign my belief in what the world is, and 2nd, I'll make my or humanity's experience abundant. If you're going to work at it, I suggest doing both in parallel. It means your abundance magick (as an example, assuming that's what you want, because it isn't what I want, or at least, not that I don't want it, but it's a low priority item for me) will not be very smooth or successful and it will run into whatever walls, and as that wall-bumping happens you get to examine what those walls are in a way that's much better than if you were doing a purely theoretical examination from a more disengaged perspective. So it's learning as you play and playing as you learn, basically. There is no need to make those sequential, like learning first, and then playing second, like we do in this shitbag of a world when we first go to school, and then we graduate, and then we do whatever the fuck the school has supposedly taught us, completely sequentially. That sequential mindset is basically bad in my view and especially for magick it is bad, because a lot of times you don't even know the real dimension of the wall you want to deal with until you first magickally bump into it in the process of attempting a real spell/transformation.

Originally commented by u/mindseal on 2017-09-04 06:15:08 (dmiqioh)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That makes sense. I agree with importance the back and forth dynamic you're talking about here. I just wanted to emphasize that there is such a dynamic in learning transformations, especially in 'probability/spell magic' since I felt like that aspect was missing, or at least under-expressed. But perhaps it was missing in my mind or understanding but was readily obvious to everyone else.

Originally commented by u/AesirAnatman on 2017-09-06 08:12:57 (dmm1lqj)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just wanted to emphasize that there is such a dynamic in learning transformations, especially in 'probability/spell magic' since I felt like that aspect was missing, or at least under-expressed.

Yea, I agree. That's pretty much what most of my life about: figuring out how and "where" I am not allowing myself to live the way I want. Basically learning the things you're talking about.

You're totally right that there is so much deep down in my intentionality that is against any would be "magick."

Originally commented by u/mindseal on 2017-09-08 09:13:49 (dmpg1lv)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To continue with an unrelated thought.

I think I've realized what may be one possible barrier for me in magic although I haven't thought it through in detail yet. On the one hand I am hesitant to believe that everyone can do magic because I don't want to be in a situation where others are more magically powerful than me since I'm currently magically weak. Seems dangerous.

On the other hand I have deep tendencies toward egalitarianism and tending to see the same rules that apply to others as applying to me.

As a result I think there's a conflict that makes it much tougher to do magic.

Originally commented by u/AesirAnatman on 2017-09-10 05:53:52 (dms8ryf)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Same here. I think in some spiritual sense we must have similar background. I can relate to what you're saying almost all the time.

Originally commented by u/mindseal on 2017-09-10 11:59:02 (dmsoq2n)