this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
153 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
10 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

MIT engineers and collaborators developed a solar-powered device that avoids salt-clogging issues of other designs.

More details in their paper here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sprinkle it on roads during the winter and have it wash back into the ocean, whence it came?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We already have plenty of salt for that.

Plus the places that are good for solar power don't tend to need salt in the winter...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, good points. Though if it is produced as a "waste" product, is there a chance it could be cheaper/greener than our current sources of salt?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe - but desalination comes up a lot and nobody seems to have identified an option yet.

If you produce too much you'll crash the price of salt. And it's so cheap I suspect most of the cost is in processing and shipping. I'm finding costs for road rock salt in the US of $60-$150 per US ton.

Putting it back in the ocean isn't a bad idea per se. The problem is when it's put back in one spot which increases salinity locally. If they distributed it into the ocean it would be fine. But the added cost makes the whole process more expensive and you can't get a headline saying your new process is "cheaper then tap".