this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1413 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68772 readers
3467 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/6745228

TLDR: Apple wants to keep china happy, Stewart was going after china in some way, Apple said don’t, Stewart walked, the show is dead.

Not surprising at all, but sad and shitty and definitely reduces my loyalty to the platform. Hosting Stewart seemed like a real power play from Apple, where conflict like this was inevitable, but they were basically saying, yes we know, but we believe in things and, as a big company with deep pockets that can therefore take risks, to prove it we’re hosting this show.

Changing their minds like this is worse than ever hosting the show in the first place as it shows they probably don’t know what they’re doing or believe in at all, like any big company, and just going for what seems cool, and undermining the very idea of a company like Apple running a streaming platform. I wonder if the Morning Show/Wars people are paying close attention.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 125 points 2 years ago (26 children)

reduces my loyalty to the platform

Why the fuck would you have any loyalty to Apple? They sure as shit don't have any loyalty to their customers. In fact they piss in the face of their customers and tell them it's raining.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Apple has setup their walled garden in such a way that you're basically all-in or all-out of their ecosystem. I don't know that they have brand loyalty as much as they have a captive audience that they can sell iWhatever to over and over again.

[–] glockenspiel 1 points 2 years ago

They do have brand loyalty. You can find market research affirming it. The most common traits associated with that loyalty is that Apple offers an all-in-one solution for repairs, easy repairs with AppleCare, easy to use devices (generally), good to great performance depending on item, and the average customer with more than an iPhone tends to have a lot of disposable income and hold what is considered a "professional" career. Or be rich. People also like that their devices hold their value much, much longer than any competitor--and it isn't even close.

I use a mixed ecosystem just fine. Sure, there isn't tight integration with my Apple stuff and my Galaxy Tab Ultra or Windows PCs. But there is basically no integration between Windows + Galaxy Tab to begin with. And what little is there either requires third party solutions or is extremely lacking.

People wrongly think Apple is selling devices and accessories primarily. They aren't. They are selling a platform. I know I can buy something they make and it will integrate nicely with everything else and maybe have a few tricks up its sleeve (take how using iPhone with an Apple TV to calibrate settings is easy and semi-unique). Windows? Not so much. Android? Maybe a little. Because Microsoft's ambitions are on the cloud side at the moment, and Google absolutely will not commit to building a real ecosystem that persists. They try and fail every few years. They could arguably beat Apple at their own game if they could just focus and change their toxic corporate dynamic.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)