this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
201 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
60024 readers
3374 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is revenue, not profit. It would be an incredibly high fine that most companies would struggle with. It's incredibly impactful, and no company is brushing off this kind of legislature.
This grandstanding isn't useful, this is a good thing and you're blustering about to make this about your own grandstanding instead.
Still too low. 56% is fitting. Nationalize that misinformation shithole.
Ah yes, government run social media. Nothing could go wrong with that.
Well, it could good. But only if it's done right, like government run news channels in Denmark, then it would be amazing!
It works like this: News channels get money to bring news, but you can make news about everything. And yes, you can criticise the government all you want in these news, and it happens daily.
Then the news channel can't take any sponsorships what so ever. There's no owners, there's no lobbying. It's just news like it should be.
that would probably make it worse, every govenment i have ever seen does horrible with internet stuff.
They suck with everything and I wouldn't use it either way. I'd rather it be owned by my government than another one who likes to ally with known enemies who would like me to suffer/die.