this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
455 points (77.1% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6216 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We're in the 21st century, and the vast majority of us still believe in an utterly and obviously fictional creator deity. Plenty of people, even in developed countries with decent educational systems, still believe in ghosts or magic (e.g. voodoo). And I--an atheist and a skeptic--am told I need to respect these patently false beliefs as cultural traditions.

Fuck that. They're bad cultural traditions, undeserving of respect. Child-proofing society for these intellectually stunted people doesn't help them; it is in fact a disservice to them to pretend it's okay to go through life believing these things. We should demand that people contend with reality on a factual basis by the time they reach adulthood (even earlier, if I'm being completely honest). We shouldn't be coddling people who profess beliefs that are demonstrably false, simply because their feelings might get hurt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was more, these are all concepts and not provable things.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what exactly makes them "not provable"?

And how do You answer questions that relate to them?

you can't do so with pure science, so you need to pick some other system to consider them.

And some people pick ficticious stories about a benevolent sky daddy.

I pick some ficticious idea of human life ha in inherent value.

What basis do I have to judge one of those better than the other? only my own ficticious idea can give me that basis.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that they are all faith based.

With careful study and consideration.

Not in the remotest. I try to believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

And there you go with denigration of those you hate. Keep your bigotry to yourself to get along in society.

No clue what this is actually intended to mean, but you are close with the fictitious idea of human life. For in fact we are nothing but animals that taught themselves pattern matching and now attempt to impose our belief in that pattern on the world.

No one has any basis for anything they belief outside of their own belief. That is the point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know why you brought hate into this, for I don't hate in this regard.

For in fact we are nothing but animals that taught themselves pattern matching and now attempt to impose our belief in that pattern on the world.

Yes, that is exactly my point: there is no "inherent" value in any of this. Without some value system of some kind, there's no way to know if a given situation or behaviour is good or bad.

And what I'm trying to say is that pure science (as in the ideas behind the scientific method) do not and can not give you that value system. They are as far from having "values" as is possible.

No one has any basis for anything they belief outside of their own belief. That is the point.

Agreed.

Some people just decide to call their own belief "religion" and others don't.

So telling someone "your made up beliefs are less worthy of consideration than my made up beliefs" doesn't really have a strong place to stand on.

However, if the argument is "your made up beliefs have effects that go against my made up beliefs" then that might be an argument, but we have to be aware that at the end of the day we're all dealing with made up beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

If you don't know why I brought hate into it, perhaps you should think about the subject more before criticizing.

Perhaps, part of your study of "some People" should include your own personal denigration of others.