Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
He made the claim that these beliefs are demonstrably false. We are waiting for the demonstration.
Also being atheist IS taking a position, making a positive claim that God does not exist. Agnosticism is neutral, not taking a stance.
Every child is born an atheist.
Science disagrees with you:
https://www.harvard.com/book/born_believers_the_science_of_childrens_religious_belief/
Sorry you feel he is not sciency enough.
You talk as if you have read the research and understood the experiments he did over 3 years in numerous mainly non-religious countries on children who were not in contact with a religious discourse. The conclusion is that they innately inclined towards believing in a higher being. Which means that NO, children are not born atheists.
Which part of the research do you disagree with? I'm eager to read your paper and assess your qualifications.
Ahh yes all those children he studied whom obviously grew up in a vacuum and were never exposed to the concept of a deity, through common language phrases and cultural beliefs.
To conduct this experiment with untainted data would likely involve placing children into an environment with no outside exposure and carefully controlled interactions with restrictions on language use which would arguably be unethical.
The research was peer reviewed. They should have included smarter people like you :)
Finally we agree on something.
There are a few proofs against existence of god. Ineffectiveness of prayer. Impossibility of miracles under controlled conditions. Biological nature of human cognition which precludes life after death.