this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
582 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
19 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
582
The rent is too damn algorithmic — DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb is investigating RealPage, a company that helps landlords set rent prices, for potential antitrust violations (washingtoncitypaper.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The rent is too damn algorithmic — DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb is investigating RealPage, a company that helps landlords set rent prices, for potential antitrust violations::Attorney General Brian Schwalb is investigating RealPage, a company that helps landlords set rent prices, for potential antitrust violations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economics doesn't work like that. Prices are already as high as the market will bear. Few people intentionally leave money on the table.

More likely:

  1. Some owners will eat the tax increase
  2. Others try to raise prices
  3. They can't get higher prices immediately because supply and demand are the same as before the tax increase
  4. They consider eating the cost or selling the property
  5. Property prices decrease due to greater supply
  6. Former renters and investors who are ok paying the tax buy the properties

End result: more owner-occupied property, some of the tax is paid by the remaining investors and renters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe I misinterpreted your original comment. Are you suggesting a that the taxes increase by 10% of the going rate (e.g. 5% -> 5.5%?), or the taxes increase by 10% of the property value (e.g. 5% -> 15%)?

If it's the latter, then that makes more sense. That would be unsustainable for a landlord, because no way in hell can someone pull an extra 50k out of their ass each year on a 500k home.