Science

13028 readers

166 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Space

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

276

"string theory lied to us and now science communication is hard" (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dr. Angela Collier plays the Binding of Isaac: Rebirth and talks at length about what went wrong with string theory, and how that affected science communication.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is lying and fearmongering? The only ones lying or misrepresenting data are people who deny that climate change is happening or that it's as severe as it is.

And while I have no faith in Democrats in the US to do anything meaningful, because they haven't, it's undeniable that when Republicans are in power, things get significantly worse. In the US we have one party that has no spine or will to do anything, and another that is not only actively denying climate change, but seeks to continue actions that accelerate it, all while gutting regulatory bodies and dismantling previous efforts.

However

If you think scientists and activists are lying and misrepresenting the data, then you haven't actually looked at the data. I'm not going to debate the realities of climate change with you or anyone else. The data is incontrovertible. There aren't two sides here, and debate only gives credence to people who try to claim it isn't happening.
The core of the issue is human greed. And that greed is given free reign under capitalism. Capitalism is the problem, and it's end is the only way forward. That is a political issue and, short of people forming militias and destroying fossil fuel companies, is going to have to be dealt with in a political arena.
Notice that never once have I said "vote Democrat" or "I endorse fearmongering to get people to vote Democrat"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm also just going to hop in here to note that you two seem to be making fairly similar points:

Making the environment about Democrats over Republicans is wildly dangerous because it breeds contentment

simply “vote democrat” has never been the answer

While there are clearly some differences in worldview here, it might be more productive to explore where you can find common ground on this issue.

I might be wrong, but I suspect that if I were to ask both of you to discuss what it is we should actually be doing about climate change I'd get two very similar responses, probably just differing on which things should get the most emphasis. (In fact, I am asking that, if you feel you can take the time to answer.)