davehtaylor

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (7 children)

That's a joke, right? Sorry if I'm missing sarcasm here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I would disagree. Bluesky has no algorithm and it's growing quite rapidly. And I think that a large part of that is just having the people there that one might want to follow, and fosters community and conversation. A place like Threads absolutely does not do that. Mastodon is just an impenetrable mess from a UX perspective. The average user doesn't care about federation and needs a solid and understandable entry point. Bluesky is federated but 90% of the people there have no idea what that means.

but trying to sidestep it completely like Mastodon is is just going to result in a network that never hits the critical mass necessary to start exponential growth

If keeping algo-gaming engagement bait off the platform is a price a platform has to pay, then I'm happily willing to accept that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Its the absolute lack of algorithm

"It's the absolute lack of a way to game the system with engagement bait and reward rage-posting"

Fixed that for you.

It's not a matter for average users, it's a matter for the people who farm engagement and post 300 times per day. Having a space that isn't dominated by accounts like that is a good thing. It's why Threads is such a miserable place. The algo there is aggressive and heavily rewards this kind of shit. Accounts like that provide no value and create toxic spaces full of rage and misinformation just to keep the waters churning and keep a constant flow of vapid "content". It's gross, and we are so much the better if we lose a ton of them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Why should we have to?

There is literally no reason for sex segregation in sports

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

There's nothing that I can point to definitively, but watching videos performances after Chester's death, and seeing Shinoda speak about it all, I honestly got the vibe that he's resentful that everyone focuses so much on Chester in a "this is actually my band, why can't you just let him go" type of thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It seems ostensibly like it would be as easy as having an understanding enough of e.g. distilling, so that if you try to distill your own spirits, you know to discard the head and tail to avoid methanol poisoning. But this is so much more complex than that.

I think what it feels like is something akin to being trans and not having access to HRT, so you get hormones on the black market vs. trying to synthesize the hormones yourself from raw materials. I would support the former (though with a lot of research and making sure you're getting reputable supplies), but think the latter incredibly fraught for a layperson.

I think the real answer isn't DIY pharmaceuticals, but rather universal healthcare, informed consent, and a medical system (both physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers) that puts patient care above any kind of profit motive

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of this. Plus the Lost Cause/pseudo-Confederate undertones to the series really do not sit or hold up well

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All the people here saying "well of course because they weren't trained on AAVE":

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT

It's the same reason facial recognition and voice recognition software have a difficult time with anyone who isn't white or a speaker of perfect, uninflected standard english. The bias is created by the developers, conscious or not, because they only train it on what's in their own bubble. If you don't have diverse teams behind the development and training, you will create this bias, whether you want to or not. This is well known.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is just post-hoc justification, coupled with "PC culture is censorship" type of bullshit.

although the word “gimp” can be used offensively in some cultures, that is not our intent

Intent is irrelevant. In this case, if you didn't mean to offend, then you apologize and then change the fucking name. You don't get to say "sorry you were offended, but I don't care" and still expect people to take you seriously. Change "gimp" in that sentence to any other slur and try to make that same kind of justification.

I does not matter if the name was

  • based on a Pulp Fiction character because the devs thought it was funny
  • was a genuine reference to kink culture
  • an abelist slur

Who tf thinks a piece of software should be named after any of that? It's 1) offensive 2) wildly unprofessional and 3) a massive barrier to adoption.

The devs have the mentality of "edgy" 14 yo teen boys, have refused to ever grow the fuck up, and just throw tantrums whenever anyone tries to have a rational conversation with them about it

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

letthemfight.jpg

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Even if their UI/UX weren't an atrocity that belongs at The Hague, the cruelty of their devs actively pushes me away from having any desire to give them another shot

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 weeks ago

It's price gouging, pure and simple. There's no positive to it whatsoever

view more: next ›