this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3580 readers
115 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If I make a post on here saying "the sky is purple", am I spreading disinformation?

Contrived example obviously but this seems like very far reaching legislation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

For the purposes of this Schedule, dissemination of content using a digital service is misinformation on the digital service if:

(a) the content contains information that is false, misleading or deceptive; and

(b)the content is not excluded content for misinformation purposes; and

(c) the content is provided on the digital service to one or more end-users in Australia; and

(d) the provision of the content on the digital service is reasonably likely to cause or contribute to serious harm.

Draft bill located here

I think the last one is key.

Also the bill doesn't empower the government to make individual rulings on misinformation. It says sites have to follow an industry code of practice to have systems in place to keep on top of misinformation.

Think of it as a way to avoid another Cronulla, or any of the pizza gate/Qanon shit happening here. i.e when news is breaking, sure let it through in the fog of war. But don't let people post for years that the election was stolen by the deep state kiddy fiddler alliance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well played, reptilians.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I figure there is a bit of leeway when it comes to misinformation. It's when it becomes serious and can cause harm, like yeah Qanon, vaccines cause autism, that sort of stuff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if anything to do with religion gets classified under the excluded content clause (b)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nope. It lists the excluded content on page 5. Can’t copy on my phone right now but basically just excludes good faith entertainment parody and satire; accredited educational bodies, professional news bodies and government bodies.

No mention of religion or belief in the entire bill.

You’d get a pass on interpretation but you won’t get a pass on making shit up that harms a religious or marginalised group. It defines harm too on page 6.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet the politicians have excluded themselves, because God knows they spout so much misinformation that they'd all be constantly in court.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep. In the draft bill, Anything published by any level of government or anything published by political parties about electoral matters or referendums is excluded. So they’re free to push misinformation to their hearts content.

Professional news content is also excluded. Though to be fair is probably included under other acma rules.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right. So the government is free to do a propaganda without consequence, but I can't? Wild.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well that's interesting. Murdoch's Fox News claimed it wasn't a news organisation in a court case.

So Sky News is gonna have to decide if it's a news organisation or potentially be up for misinformation....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They already have Parliamentary Privilege.