this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
169 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
242 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regional co-ops (or regional branches of a national co-op) could provide wireless internet. It's not ideal but if a person is not willing to accept Rogers, Bell or Telus, it could be acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Totally. But this is very different from buying TekSavvy. TekSavvy serves the vast majority of their customers via ROBeLUS'es last mile infrastructure. They can't do that via regional wireless and so whoever buys them will have to keep paying ROBeLUS. If they can't break even at this point, a new owner such as a co-op will have the same problem. The only owner that won't is ROBeLUS. The only solution to this conundrum is federal intervention via CRTC, Industry Canada or the government itself. My guess we'll hear from Jagmeet first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oh god no, I don't think the suggestion is we should form a co-op that buys TekSavvy. I can think of a lot of reasons that's impractical. But I think there is realistically a space for Internet co-ops to be viable for some parts of Canada, if not universally.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

who’s in to form a co-op and buy them?

dang, nvm. *puts sword away*