this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
85 points (63.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43971 readers
687 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Your source is pro-russia, pro-china, and other authoritarian regimes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a well-sourced article, get over yourself

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They spin those facts in their own bias, in which is authoritarian bullshit.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Burden of proof is on your for that one, bud

Tangentially, "lying is authritarian" doesn't give me much hope for the rest of your critique you may offer.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia isn't a valid source. Didn't your teachers tell you that in 9th grade?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia has citations on every one of those points.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A combination of citations that are either useless for demonstrating anything (see reference 25) or hinge on the western pop-politics conspiracy that there is a genocide of the people of Xinjiang (21, 26, 30), looking in the intro.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I don't mean to tell you your job, but this seems awfully flippant for "combating authoritarianism" or whatever neoliberal bullshit you characterize yourself with.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So they're based? Good to know.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm undeniably pro-gulag so thanks for letting me know this source is for me!