this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)
Git
2905 readers
1 users here now
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Resources
Rules
- Follow programming.dev rules
- Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
- No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.
Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have two.
I prefer Fork since it's stupidly easy to rebase, and it's stupidly easy to stage by line instead of by file. This lets me split my changes into different logical commits which makes reviewing those changes back so much faster.
I can't help but cringe when I see devs add every change to a single commit instead of separating their changes.
Being able to stage only specific lines of files allows you to finalise one part of your changes that you know are finished, while you're still half way through with your other change.
What's easier to read?
Branch 1 (the commit everything in a file approach):
Branch 2 (the commit the relevant lines approach):
Now if I realise later on that the bugfix had an unintentional side effect, I can single out the bugfix by itself, and not need to figure out why debugging messages are getting sent, or why a whole bunch of variables in another spot were changed.