this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
207 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
6226 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] danhab99 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When a service is willing to take responsibility for collisions and driving violations

Devil's advocate: it's kinda hard to pin the responsibility on Tesla when at the end of the day there was a person driving and the driver's always responsible.

I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm on team ban-human-drivers

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ideally, we'd get to the point where the driver merely directs the vehicle to where it wants to go, and then the computer system works out all the pathfinding and maneuvering, so that yes, any instance where a vehicle avoidably collides with another thing can be regarded as a malfunction.