this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
610 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
15 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
610
Yes, a Pigeon is Faster for Data Transfer than Gigabit Fiber Internet (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yes, a Pigeon is Faster for Data Transfer than Gigabit Fiber Internet::A decade ago, a pigeon with a 4 GB memory stick outran an ISP’s ADSL service. A 2023 rematch features a bird with 3 TB of flash drives vs gigabit internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm not the original author:

Trebuchets are the most technologically advanced siege engines of all time, and are capable of hurling a 90kg stone over 300m using a counterweight.

With this in mind, we can perform the following calculations:

A 22TB WD Red Pro drive weighs 670g, with a maximum hurl weight of 90kg, trebuchet can hurl 134 drives at once, totalling 2,948 TB of data.

The average speed of a trebuchet projectile is 54m/s and the average size of an American 'block' is 100m. Lets presume 3 blocks to get our full trebuchets use (fuck you catapults).

It'll take 5.5 seconds for the projectile to go from launch to dramatic landing, meaning a throughput of 536TB a second.

Therefore, trebuchets are the best transfer method.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All of these methods have extreme bandwidth but terrible latency and packet loss.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Just use half the bandwidth for redundancy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You've heard of RAID but have you ever tried SEIGE?

[–] starman 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Poor HDDs

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

If you use Western Digital, the HDDs won't notice the extreme transfer method. They'll be unreadable either way

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Only download, no upload.. Dammit leechers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In a real world scenario this would need to account for protection to the storage devices to prevent damage and potential loss of data from damage

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

At this point why not get a 30 ton truck to carry all those WD Red Pros? Sure you can only go 30 m/s but the carrying capacity is much greater!