Asklemmy

43857 readers

1864 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If it took you X hours to get somewhere, for how many hours would it feel worth it to stay at bare minimum? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Would you want to stay for at least X hours? 2X? 4X? Something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's a 2:1 ratio because it's X hours traveling there, X hours spent at the location, and then X hours coming back home, totaling 2X hours in transit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

At least a much time there as time to get there. Not the round trip time.

Preferably, at least as much time there as round trip time. However, I have violated this, so it is clearly not my limit.

Technically, I have stayed for shorter times. Those were not "for fun" trips and had important goals attached.

I am also discounting all one-way trips of less than an hour.