this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
74 points (95.1% liked)

Programming

17455 readers
63 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The title would probably be confusing, but I could not make it better than this. I noticed that most programming languages are limited to the alphanumerical set along with the special characters present in a general keyboard. I wondered if this posed a barrier for developers on what characters they were limited to program in, or if it was intentional from the start that these keys would be the most optimal characters for a program to be coded in by a human and was later adopted as a standard for every user. Basically, are the modern keyboards built around programming languages or are programming languages built around these keyboards?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Some of the "toy" languages used for code-golf can use some very non standard characters. Saying "all programming languages" is going to be very restrictive.

[–] jvisick 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s a little pedantic, don’t you think?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ohh very much so. This wasn't meant as a criticism of OP's question. I was just trying to make sure they were aware of all the niche programming languages out there, especially the ones that use some rather exotic character sets.

load more comments (1 replies)