Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5628 readers

22 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.
No piracy

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

UndercoverUlrikHD

[email protected]

[Official] Winner of the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup! (in the comments) (www.fifa.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not the one saying there’s a rule for 16 overtime when maybe 5 were warranted. Of course it’s subjective whatever the fourth official gets told to do by the bald Qatari.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, if you think there was only 5 minutes when the ball was out of the play then I don't really know what else can be said.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We all know if it had been 3:0 after 90 minutes, the overtime would have been a reasonable 5 minutes. FIFA wanted 13 so they could hope for more drama if there had been a goal by England. The 1:0 gave them ideas.

And it’s worrisome that normal people come to FIFA’s defense here, as if it’s not common knowledge that they force the officials to make matches “more exciting”.