this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1491 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3611 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Why remote desktop? I can understand the rest. But who uninstalls default apps and doesn't use remote desktop?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Very few people use remote desktop.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Very few people bother removing all the default apps in the first place.

The type of high caliber nerd to care about a pre installed app that sits dormant and uses a few MB of storage probably already uses remote desktop often enough they'd want to keep it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I would have used it but it's only available on Pro/Enterprise versions. But that led me to finding Parsec so all ended well.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Remote Desktop App vs Remote Desktop Connection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The remote desktop app isn't installed by default. At least I've never seen it installed by default.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hmm, I can't imagine they mean MSTSC. The RD App sucks ballz

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I agree with that “and”