this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43751 readers
1234 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm new to the fediverse, and so far, I have been seeing some situations from lemmy instances rejecting users to defederating from others, but I ask myself: what can be done if trolls or bots come from self-hosted single-user instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They get defederated wherever they get consistently banned...and then they can federate with their friends and make their community of shit and yell at each other or something.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can it be practical if several instances get created programmatically?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, if we had a DDOS-like barrage of troll instances, probably a solution would be to institute a "pending federation request" for any new communities.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A reputation/trustworthiness rating for instances might be helpful too, something akin to karma but for the instance as a whole. More vulnerable communities would be able to set a minimum trust requirement for unapproved participation.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like that idea. It would be good to put numbers on positive community traits like trust, helpfulness, politeness, inclusiveness, innovation, etc. so that amoral analysts have something more to go on than Nusers, connections, clicks and replies when deciding what/how to monetize things. A bit like biodiversity protection...or a freedom index or HDI.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Matrix was working on something similar a whole back, although it may be easier to do on Lemmy

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks interestsing.

Would it be also possible to ask for a captcha on the first interactions users from new instances make?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, because they would have to solve captchas on every instance they're federated with. You'd be solving like 29 captchas per post

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

This should be the default in the next Lemmy version because otherwise it's only going to get easier for people to launch new instances and it's going to get too overwhelming

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe there is a whitelist mode, that isn't currently enabled but in that mode new instances are defederated by default. That would be a pain to administer for all the small instances joining, so they may set some size or reputation rules to apply for federation (??). I imagine this is inevitable if automated instance spamming becomes a problem, unless some type of RBL comes in vogue for managing federation first. It may become impossible to manage manually.

E: oh the whitelist thing may only be relevant to kbin federation, as that was the topic I saw it in. Sometimes I forget where I am :-/