Technology

I saw an interview of a professional on this matter. Unfortunately I don't remember his name but the points he made were thought provoking.

Today we consume more and faster media than ever, but few people ever spent all their time reading alone quietly or even watched TV focusing solely on the program. We listen to radio or a have conversation simultaneously. Our hunter-gatherer ancestors listened to each other's stories while doing small tasks in their homes. Conversations between people flow and change subjects constantly. Almost like TikToks.

The point is that it's nothing new that we engage in a combination of activities and like to surround ourselves with multiple or fast paced sources of information and stimulation.

My personal view is that TikToks being short or fast paced isn't an issue. But there are other aspects that worry me. Social media videos cause many people to develop various degrees of parasocial relationships with the creators, and the content satisfies the need for actual relationships and can make real life and people seem boring.

I'm going to point to a large number of 2 hour + Youtube videos. I can't tell you who's watching them, or if more people are, but there wasn't anything like that 25 years ago. I'll also point to podcasts and the plethora of 3-6 hour or more - isn't Joe Rogan's like 8 hours long? And it's one of the most popular ones.

There's more novels today than ever before, and people reading via Kindle Unlimited and just up and buying them.

Prestige TV is often 60 minutes or 90 minutes, in comparison to 42 being a "normal hour long broadcast show".

There's more kinds of content, but I disagree that the length of consumed media in general is getting shorter and shorter.

I remember seeing something basically disproving the claim that our attention span is getting shorter. Brb searching the source

I have been trying to work on my attention span ever since quitting Reddit. There's this great book I'm reading, it has everything in it that I love, I would have been pulled in if this was 20 years ago (yeah, I'm old). But I find I can only handle about 5 minutes or so before I feel that urge for "fresh" information. It sucks!

No. I'm saying that this is rage bait and been said about everything from rock music to pokemon.

I personally think that needs some definition and study. People are less interested in being bored because they can avoid it. It really depends on what's going on and what the task is. If I'm standing in line, it's not a lack of attention being on my phone. It's a lack of interest in being immersed in staring at the floor waiting in line. If I'm in a meeting of someone talking to hear their own voice, I'm going to look at my e-mail. I guess in the past I zoned out, but neither is indicative of my attention span.

I always see these things not making a distinction on whether someone is actually trying to pay attention or not. I'm also kind of less sure that attention is trained - that your kids attention span is primarily set by whether they watch TikTok vs full Disney movies. This seems like a bit of a facile comparison.

For instance, if I'm actively working on something, I can pay attention to it for at least a few hours. It's just that I'm often blocked, waiting on another person or process to complete. Or I'm actively responding to e-mails, which again looks like blipping from task to task, but really isn't. Of course, I'm not a kid, but I recall all the "soundbites rather than analysis" from the 90s when I was a teen.

You know what I did before the internet? Be bored. A lot. It was fucking boring. It was unbearably dull. If people want to fill their lives with tiktok when they are waiting at a bus stop instead of just staring into nothing, more power to them.

I used to watch boring, crap fucking TV just because there was four TV channels and it was raining outside. Already read all my books twice over. Awful.