this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
1178 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32048 readers
1624 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I watched oppenheimer in emacs, u watched it in imax, we are not the same

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

nanoers just never figured out how to :wq

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you listen closely, you can still hear the terminal bells ringing of those that never managed to ESC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those who never managed to ESC, reset.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They just said :wq in school, so thanks for the tip. Hard to believe it saves even when the file hasn't been changed if you use :wq. What is the use case for that? If the file gets changed in another program and you want to revert?? Edit: Just saw the comment about the modification times being updated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But what if you wanted to write even if there weren't changes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then you use :wq

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And how often do you want to do that exactly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

:x? Real Programmers use ZZ.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

habit lol. i use :w a lot so :wq feels like a natural extension

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Heh yeah and it's not like it makes any difference; they're effectively the same thing. :wq just updates modification time even if there were no changes – same as doing :w and :q separately – but :x doesn't. Super intuitive interface 😅