this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
175 points (77.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35393 readers
9 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To me, it seems objectively easier to pull into a parking space forward and then back out of the space when you are ready to leave. You don't have to line up with the lines while driving backwards, and it's easier to keep from hitting other cars as well. So why back in? To me, the only advantage I can think of is that you can get out quicker, technically.

Edit: I do not need driving instruction, just wondered why. The reasoning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 194 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This sentiment is why I fully believe at least 50% of you shouldn't be allowed to operate a motor vehicle.

Which is more dangerous, backing into a parking spot, or backing into traffic?

For the love of God, if you drive a vehicle, figure it out.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I genuinely think the bar for a driver's licence should be raised to take 50% or more off the road.

Can't reverse park? Don't know where oil water and air goes on your car? Lack confidence in certain conditions? Here's a free bus pass.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A lot of people don't even want to drive, but in a lot of places there's just no viable alternative.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

raises hand

I actually like cars. (They're... "cool". I play Forza sometimes, lol.) But the reality is they're fucking expensive to maintain, along with insurance and taxes and fuel. And very much not fun to drive under normal circumstances, next to removeds and idiots. And terrible for the environment, at absurd US numbers at least.

I'd rather save thousands of dollars and have public transit or easily maintained bike. But bikes are not viable when planet is trying to kill us (Texas is 100-110 °F for 2 months straight now).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a big advocate for changing that.

Driving should be a privilege, not a right.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Before being either a provledge or a right, driving should not be a necessity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you look at the state driver's manuals from the dmv it actually says exactly that. It's already considered a privilege. Otherwise you wouldn't have to test into it and pay annually to keep your car on the road.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where are you from where those things are not part of a driving test?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They make you check for water or air on a test or expect you to know? That would be novel in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, in the UK it's part of the theory test, you have to know how and when to check air and fluid levels in order to get a licence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Here in the states you need to know how to press the pedals and you're all set

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Those are all things you need to pass to get your driver’s license here in The Netherlands. We still have idiots on the road. Granted, they don’t (or at least, very rarely) slam their vehicles through the fronts of stores and houses, but we still got idiots doing idiot things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I'm the era before every car had a camera, I'd back into my driveway because foggy windows plus backing up sucks. I still back into my driveway even with all of the current day features on my vehicle - it's just less stress in the morning to pull forward.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if it is a parking lot that has zero traffic. Is it better to back into a confined space or back out into an open area?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zero traffic would mean it's an empty lot. If there's a curb or cement blocks preventing pull through, I'd still back into a spot.

But to answer the spirit of your question, it's easier to back in to a confined spot due to the steering being on the "back" side and ability to use the side mirrors to line it up. Other than pull through spots, I can't think of a single good reason to pull in to a parking spot forwards rather than back in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree it can be easier. I prefer it if the spot I am backing into is tight. When I say zero traffic I should clarify to mean it is very unlikely to have another vehicle in motion within your yard when you are parking/leaving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

what if a frog had wings?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Generally not a lot of traffic in parking lots.