Text Editors

457 readers

1 users here now

Icon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon

finone

Is there a text editor that would allow me to create syntax highlighting easily? (self.text_editors)

submitted 1 year ago by Reptorian to c/text_editors

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically just the title said. The situation is basically I use a Domain-Specific Language called G'MIC, and to this day, I haven't found a satisfactory answer to the issue of lack of syntax highlighting. At the moment, I am using KDE Kate as it's pretty good at structuring the code with their find/replace feature, tab indicators, and multi-window support.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Reptorian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Getting highlighting for regex-based selection to work. That seems confusing. I have 7 criterias which is recommended for the G'MIC language.

Note:

Strings that matches #( |$|(#)+).* gets treated as if it was a comment.
Strings that matches #@cli.* are treated as if they’re a header for CLI codes.
Strings that matches \$(-\d+|\w+|\d+) gets treated as if they’re accessed variables.
Strings that matches \w+: are treated as if they’re commands names.
Any texts under control-flow item list gets highlighted as long as they’re outside any characters between 2 quotation marks and of course, taking into account of / being used as escape character.
#@gui gets bolded.
Anything between 2 quotation marks gets highlighted though escape characters would be considered.

[+] TheCee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] Reptorian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have a update for you, I am finally pulling it off!

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/880256029705773099/1138887510710308904/image.png

There will be problems down the road, but I will worry about that later.

[+] TheCee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Reptorian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So far, the most challenging part was highlighting things that counts as comment rather than pointers to image pixels or accessible variables. That's not the end of my trouble though.

I do want to figure out how to highlight "expr" including newlines inside expr. expr is basically any mathematical expression that is utilized on JIT compilation.

if expr
repeat expr
variable={expr}
variable:=expr <- : can be replaced with operator and it will still apply.
eval expr
eval "expr"
check "expr"
fill expr
fill "expr"
eval>expr
eval >"expr"
fill >expr
fill >"expr"
{expr}
for expr
{"expr"}
while expr

Along with that to set up regex inside it to highlight section of expr.

While still maintaining priority of regex. So, if one regex is more important, it'll overwrite whatever highlighted.

[–] Reptorian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no standard regarding G'MIC scripting. That being said, here's a representative G'MIC script - https://pastebin.com/cEPW31HJ .

The first one is basically a example script for testing syntax highlighting. The second one is a real world case study. The second one can be found in https://github.com/GreycLab/gmic-community/blob/master/include/reptorian.gmic .

I haven't included some concepts in the example_cli as you can see that reptorian.gmic introduces some concepts not seen in both. Basically, writing a syntax highlighter for G'MIC would be a nightmare. But doable if I can figure things out.