this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)
Ask UK
1517 readers
83 users here now
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the UK.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I didn’t realize a panel of doctors concluded that she’s not at fault. Wow. So, is the general thinking that the courts got it wrong?
It's being slanted that way in the media to get clicks, but the evidence is massive but dry, boring and hard to follow. It's like:
Lucy's swipe card shows she was in at A time, she was updated computer records at BC and D times, and using her phone at EF and G times. Person H saw her doing I at J time, person K saw her etc etc. It all pinpoints her movements.
There's also many things like Lucy says she could see Child I was pale from 5 or 6 feet away in a darkened room in the below cot, which isn't credible:
And in cross examination about it she said she could see it because "I knew what I was looking for... I mean at".
Interesting. Thanks!
Np anytime