Ask UK

It's being slanted that way in the media to get clicks, but the evidence is massive but dry, boring and hard to follow. It's like:

Lucy's swipe card shows she was in at A time, she was updated computer records at BC and D times, and using her phone at EF and G times. Person H saw her doing I at J time, person K saw her etc etc. It all pinpoints her movements.

There's also many things like Lucy says she could see Child I was pale from 5 or 6 feet away in a darkened room in the below cot, which isn't credible:

And in cross examination about it she said she could see it because "I knew what I was looking for... I mean at".