this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Ask UK

1517 readers
24 users here now

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the UK.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've got a bit lost with it cos a) it's unfathomable b) there's a lot of info

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I think it's over but I got lost. She's already lost appeals, and if she had more evidence you'd think she'd have called more than just a plumber to give evidence in her defence!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

That's one of the most puzzling things about this case, why the defence didn't put up a fight. They had a medical expert ready to dispute the the prosecution's assertions but never called them... The stats were being questioned externally as soon as the trial started, but they never touched on that. It's really bizarre.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

I think the theory is it's because the experts would have had to agree with prosecution points as well. So yes they might disagree with children A-C, F and L but they agree with the others.