this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1138 points (97.8% liked)

196

3193 readers
2238 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can you explain the "conservatism good" message you see?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

the bankers in book one are literally a bigoted analog for jews.

an entire swath of story is about “mudbloods” and race mixing and some characters railing against it.

there is actual slavery.

stuff american conservatives are all pushing as ideas in our current world.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The goblins, no argument here. But the rest, it seems like the entire point of the book is fighting against those things?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Against the slavery of the elfs that was a Hermione thing that everyone else laughed about and it was used on the book for comedic bits.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

It's not just comedic bits. It's all over the place, just hitting the reader over the head that slavery is good because actually they like it and it's good for them.

It's really annoying because Hermione does say something like they only like it because that's the system they've been forced into and it's all they know, but then everyone just rolls their eyes and says that she's stupid for thinking this. It's almost like Rowling knows that it should be seen as bad and why, but then can't actually bring herself to write that because it blames systems, not people.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, the smartest character in the book fights for their freedom. I'm sure a lot of readers shared the opinion that the slavery was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Her fight was still presented as a joke, bet half the readers just went "haha silly Hermione, who dosen't wants free servants??"

Edit: on top of that, Rowling uses the trope of the natural state of the slave is being slaved and is actually good for them, with the other freed house elves that is depressed because she dosen't have a family to work for.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Yes that edit is a good point that I'd forgotten.

Moved on to Terry Pratchett early on, so much better in every way.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then she just stopped doing it, I guess, because in the last book's epilogue literally nothing changed with the system

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

By then she was one of the "Haves." Turns out she was selfish all along.

Edit: I mean the author, not Hermione

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

And they were all antagonists, they werent being portrayed in a good light, they were all portrayed as evil.

At least in the movies I never actually read the books

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

See Seamus Finnegan, Pavarti ? Cho Chang, fleur de'lacour. If the character isn't British British they are a full caricature.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Other than the bankers, the other two are clearly painted in an unfavorable light, which is fine. You have to have conflict in order to have a story, of course.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Ironically when I was a kid, Harry Potter was written by the devil and to read it would be practicing demonic witchcraft. My upbringing was definitely not unique in that regard.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's a very British conservatism. it's about blood. the story has people constantly accusing Harry of having bad parentage; as his aunt says "bad blood will out". a left leaning story would have shown that blood had nothing to do with it. Harry was not raised by his dead parents regardless of how good or bad they are. Harry knew trauma and abuse, then was given his values by Dumbledore and hagrid and lupin and his friends.

but that's not what happened. in the end it's not that blood and lineage doesn't matter. it's just that his parents were actually high class and wealthy. so Harry won because he had good blood and was the chosen one. he won because of the innate quality he was born with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Blood is magical. It allows Voldemort to touch Harry.

Harry was never the chosen one except for the fact that Voldemort chose him. It is explained that Longbottom could have fit the prophecy. And prophecies don't always come true.

They even have a term, mudblood.

Harry has a piece of Voldemort living inside him. That's why it is always mentioned. He does have an evil piece inside him.

His parents being "high class or wealthy" didn't matter. His mother's sacrifice protected Harry, her love.

Harry was an average wizard at best. He won because of friendship and everyone helping out.