this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
285 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

69867 readers
5557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

As much as I dislike crypto, this is not a crypto fail story, even though the article paints it like that a few times (or at least the tone implies).

No one should have their finger servered because of other people's greediness.

These are the occasions I wish death penalty was a thing, especially for those cases where the idiots have been caught in the act - there are better things to do with my tax money than making sure they have a place to live in and some nice good meals to go with it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So, because I can't solve one problem, I shouldn't ever try to solve a different one? I like Gandalf as much as the next guy, but their world is very simple - evil is evil, good is good and there's no place for shades of gray.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

It means death is final and you shouldn't always act rashly. Gollum was a baby eater and absolutely evil.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

We need more Gandalves and less Sarumen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The death penalty doesn't work at all because the state serves capital (among other reasons). The worst offenders are never punished.

If you want the death penalty, there are far worse crimes than this. Just look at the genocide of Palestinians. Those murderers are invited to dinner with presidents.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These are the occasions I wish death penalty was a thing, especially for those cases where the idiots have been caught in the act - there are better things to do with my tax money than making sure they have a place to live in and some nice good meals to go with it.

I do understand how you feel about that and I do kinda feel the same, BUT ... you always have to assure that every last person has rights and gets acceptable treatment, even the ones who seemingly have no soul. Because if there's ever a category of people without rights, any government would have an easy way to get rid of eveyone critizing them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

There's this one Nazi CEO that I hope we can agree either has no soul or at least one that we could do without. Yet we're not killing him.

Killing people is wrong and while there may be factors that make it seem more warranted, nothing will ever make it right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

nothing will ever make it right.

Strongly disagree. If someone had killed Musk a year ago, the world would be a different place today. A better place, I think.

If someone had killed Trump ten years ago, how many COVID deaths would be avoided? How much damage to our economy would not have happened? How many hungry people across the world would still have food from a USAID shipment?

There are plenty of times it would be right to kill people. But who can we trust to make that decision? I'm confident I'm right, but I would not want to have to do it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a side note. A death penalty case actually costs more than a life sentence.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

In the US where they decided to make the punitive system for-profit?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

No. It's more that they have higher costs and it averages out around 20 years. So it's close to the average length of a life sentence except if they're young. It's only real cheap if you have a kangaroo court and just shoot people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While I do recognise the colloquial and unserious tone of your argument, I have to disagree wholeheartedly: Human right are universal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's hard. I'm not really against death penalty on its own, I think there are crimes which deserve exactly that. My issue with death penalty is how easy it is to misuse. So in a theoretical world where some perfect entity with no ability to make mistakes decides who gets it, I'm 100% in favour. In the real world, not so much.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As long as we have the option to separate and isolate, nobody deserves to be killed. The death penalty is nothing more than formalised murder, however one chooses to look at it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Atonement and facing the consequences of one's actions during a long life in prison is a fate worse than death IMO. Even for a sociopath.

And it is false that the death penalty is cheaper than life sentences: https://sites.psu.edu/bleonard/2020/11/30/the-death-penalty-v-life-in-prison/

But above it all, while there are persons unjustly sentenced to death and found later Innocent, can we really keep doing this?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a very American context where prisons are for-profit companies (wtf USA?), that's why everything is so expensive. In a normal country death sentence wouldn't cost nearly as much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

The prisons that hold death row inmates are not private, for-profit companies. The numbers have been falling steadily and are incredibly low. Still a problem, because that number is high enough to have stupid amounts of influence, but it has nothing to do with death penalty costs. Those are all because we afford death row inmates a large amount of appeals, which costs 'lawyer money' where some prosecuting lawyer pretends he wasn't on a salary and they claim it's worth X hours x Y wage, and the defense attorney does the same but with a little more truth because he is getting paid by the hour.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, you can call it that and yeah, it might make some people think more before being in favour of it just because it doesn't sound as bad.

But I disagree with the first part, plenty deserve to be killed, always had and always will.

In theory death penalty is exactly that - people justly decide that someone harms society too much and they don't want that person in society.

(again, note that I don't think it should be implemented in real world because of how easily corruptible people are)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No. Murder is murder. There is no rationalising one's way around it. There is no acceptable context for killing someone other than immediate self-defence, which is not the case when discussing things in terms of justice systems.

Killing is never justice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There is no acceptable context for killing someone other than immediate self-defence

But you know he's gonna kill a hundred people next week. Starve ten thousands people to death over the next six months. Start world war 3, and cause the death of millions of people. Those people people have no recourse to self defence, but you could defend them, right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Again, this is not immediate self-defence, this is something else entirely: this type of situation demands systemic change.

As a Romanian, our Revolution ended the instant the people took back control of this nation and Ceaușescu had no more power (it was obvious, because literally nobody was taking orders from him at that point). Then they shot him. Then they shot his wife. That's the point when the Revolution just turned into mob murder.

In this case, it is the people's duty to protect their collective interests, yes, but killing still isn't justified. You remove them from authority then send them on their merry way to live out their standards alone, far from the rest of us.

Friggin' children know this already, if someone doesn't play nice, you stop playing with them. Why the hell are we still debating the ""virtues"" of murder?!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Again, this is not immediate self-defence, this is something else entirely: this type of situation demands systemic change.

I'm aware it's not immediate self defence, that's kind of the point of the question. How many people die while you work on that change? Why are ok killing to defend yourself now, but not to defend a hundred people tomorrow?

You remove them from authority then send them on their merry way to live out their standards alone, far from the rest of us.

And you hope they don't come back with more people and a plan for revenge. Napoleon was sent off on his merry way. His return cost over 50,000 lives.

Friggin’ children know this already, if someone doesn’t play nice, you stop playing with them.

And what if they won't let you stop playing with then? Children know bullies, too, and know that you can't just ignore them.

Why the hell are we still debating the ““virtues”” of murder?!

Because you are unwilling to admit that some people need killing. Not very many, in my opinion. There are usually better options. But killing someone is the only way to be 100% sure that they stop hurting people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's really easy to kill someone when you're locked up all day in a double-walled room, or when you're exiled alone on an island... Good thinking...

This is why our society is going down the gutter, because people are still trying to rationalise and justify the unjustifiable...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

when you’re exiled alone on an island…

50,000 corpses at Waterloo would debate this one with you.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago

Yep, we're totally in those times... You do realise our methods and resources have changed immensely, right? It can be done. Your way remains and shall remain unjustifiable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Universal but also uninalienable

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago

Death Penalty has no justification. Expand your mind past the recitivist police state mentality before you get us all killed starting with the most marginalized kthx and byyeeeee

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I dont like death penalty for the people who would deserve it because it lets them off too easy. Why should they be allowed to leave this hell in easy way while we have to remain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

And what does that achieve? Nothing. It's just revenge which is useless. If it's an easy way out, so be it. It's also an easy way away from others.
Not sure about death penalty, but having access to euthanasia both inside and outside prison feels like a better solution. Outside first, you don't want people commiting crimes just to access euthanasia.