this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
43 points (90.6% liked)

Asklemmy

47791 readers
809 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Private property? Freedom of speech? Freedom to breed? Freedom of thought?...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

America is not nearly as free as it claims to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, it isn't.

What does that have to do with my claim?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We’re talking about a better world and giving up freedoms. Americans have given up a bunch of freedoms and have gotten a worse world because of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The one does not flow directly from the other. A better world requires some protecting from each other, which means giving up some freedoms. A system of complete and total freedom would not be good for most people.

However, as Franken said, it is important not to give up essential freedoms. What freedoms, exactly, count as "essential" ones? Hard to say. We should have a thread to discuss it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, the freedom to murder people would not be good for most people, but you are taking away others’ freedoms when you do that. But, this thread is about private property, speech, starting a family, and thought. Maybe I should have been more specific in my original comment. A better world wouldn’t require sacrificing these freedoms. It would require giving up the freedom to take others’ freedoms away.

Any freedom that means you have control over your own body and thoughts, I would consider an “essential” freedom, and those are the ones that I mean when I say a better world wouldn’t require giving up those freedoms. If you’re giving up your right to control your own body, you’re inviting a worse world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

On this, I think we can agree.